Background: There is a tendency to individualize treatment in chronic hepatitis C patients depending on viral load and rapid clearance of HCV-RNA. Aim: To evaluate the cost (€, 2006) per sustained virologic response in naïve patients with therapy à la carte compared with standard combination therapy. Methods: A decision analysis model was used to compare standard therapy with peginterferon alpha and ribavirin for 24 weeks for genotype (G) 2/3, and 48 weeks for G1 and therapy à la carte with the same drugs but different durations: G1 high viral load for 48 weeks, G1 low viral load with rapid virologic response for 24 weeks, and without rapid virologic response for 48 weeks, and G2/3 with rapid virologic response for 12 weeks, and without rapid virologic response for 24 weeks. Results: Sustained virologic response was similar in both strategies. The cost per successfully treated patient for standard therapy is €17 812 and for therapy à la carte €12 313. Assuming that 13 309 patients with standard therapy and 14 450 patients with therapy à la carte achieve sustained virologic response, therapy à la carte has an overall cost-saving of €59.13 million. Conclusion: Therapy à la carte is a cost-saving strategy for chronic hepatitis C infection compared to standard therapy, with lower investment requirement per patient to achieve sustained virologic response. © 2007 The authors.
CITATION STYLE
Buti, M., Casado, M. A., & Esteban, R. (2007). Evaluating the cost of sustained virologic response in naïve chronic hepatitis C patients treated à la carte. Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 26(5), 705–716. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03419.x
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.