Groupitizing reflects conceptual developments in math cognition and inequities in math achievement from childhood through adolescence

2Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Understanding the cognitive processes central to mathematical development is crucial to addressing systemic inequities in math achievement. We investigate the “Groupitizing” ability in 1209 third to eighth graders (mean age at first timepoint = 10.48, 586 girls, 39.16% Asian, 28.88% Hispanic/Latino, 18.51% White), a process that captures the ability to use grouping cues to access the exact value of a set. Groupitizing improves each year from late childhood to early adolescence (d = 3.29), is a central predictor of math achievement (beta weight =.30), is linked to conceptual processes in mathematics (minimum d = 0.69), and helps explain the dynamic between the ongoing development of non-symbolic number concepts, systemic educational inequities in school associated with SES, and mathematics achievement (minimum beta weight =.11) in ways that explicit symbolic measures may miss.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Guillaume, M., Roy, E., Van Rinsveld, A., Starkey, G. S., Uncapher, M. R., & McCandliss, B. D. (2023). Groupitizing reflects conceptual developments in math cognition and inequities in math achievement from childhood through adolescence. Child Development, 94(2), 335–347. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13859

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free