Evidence-based review of the use of the pulmonary artery catheter: Impact data and complications

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
161Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) was introduced in 1971 for the assessment of heart function at the bedside. Since then it has generated much enthusiasm and controversy regarding the benefits and potential harms caused by this invasive form of hemodynamic monitoring. This review discusses all clinical studies conducted during the past 30 years, in intensive care unit settings or post mortem, on the impact of the PAC on outcomes and complications resulting from the procedure. Although most of the historical observational studies and randomized clinical trials also looked at PAC-related complications among their end-points, we opted to review the data under two main topics: the impact of PAC on clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness, and the major complications related to the use of the PAC. © 2006 BioMed Central Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hadian, M., & Pinsky, M. R. (2006, November 27). Evidence-based review of the use of the pulmonary artery catheter: Impact data and complications. Critical Care. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc4834

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free