High levels of genetic variability and inbreeding in two Neotropical dioecious palms with contrasting life histories

18Citations
Citations of this article
59Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We characterized the population genetics of two Neotropical dioecious palm species of Chamaedorea with contrasting life strategies from the region that is both the northernmost extent and most species rich of the genus. Chamaedorea tepejilote is a common, wind-pollinated arboreal understory palm. Although most adult plants reproduce each year, only a few individuals produce the majority of flowers and seeds. Chamaedorea elatior, conversely, is an uncommon climbing subcanopy palm with entomophilous flowers (insect-pollinated characteristics). Most of the mature palms do not reproduce in consecutive years and fruiting is episodic. Isozymes with a total of 107 alleles for 27 loci of 17 enzymes from six populations were assessed. For both species, co-occurrence of high levels of genetic variation and homozygosity was observed (C. tepejilote: He: 0.385-0.442, f: 0.431-0.486; C. elatior: He: 0.278-0.342, f: 0.466-0.535). Genetic differentiation of C. elatior was much lower (θ=0.0315) than that for C. tepejilote (θ=0.152). The contrast in differentiation may be influenced by differences in the spatial scale of the genetic neighborhoods of the two species. The simultaneous maintenance of inbreeding and of a large number of alleles within the populations is attributable to the low and variable number of mating pairs. Demographic studies indicate that this pattern could be explained by low reproductive frequency among individuals and over years in C. elatior and by reproductive dominance in C. tepejilote. © 2007 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Luna, R., Epperson, B. K., & Oyama, K. (2007). High levels of genetic variability and inbreeding in two Neotropical dioecious palms with contrasting life histories. Heredity, 99(4), 466–476. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.hdy.6801027

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free