Circumcision revision in male children

12Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To determine indications for circumcision revision and to identify the specialty of the person who performed unsatisfactory primary circumcision. Materials and Methods: The authors reviewed medical records of 52 cases that underwent circumcision revision over a 6-year period (1998 to 2004). Sleeve surgical technique was used for revision in patients with redundant foreskin or concealed penis, penoplasty for partial or complete degloving of the penis and meatotomy for external meatal stenosis. The mean age of children was 32 months (range 6 months to 9 years). Results: Most of unsatisfactory primary circumcisions (86.7%) were performed by laymen. All patients who underwent circumcision revision had good to excellent cosmetic results. Conclusion: Primary circumcision performed by laymen carry a high complication rate and serious complications may occur. A period of training and direct supervision by physicians is required before allowing laymen to perform circumcision independently.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Al-Ghazo, M. A., & Banihani, K. E. (2006). Circumcision revision in male children. International Braz J Urol, 32(4), 454–458. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-55382006000400013

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free