Alternative Methods for Grouping Race and Ethnicity to Monitor COVID-19 Outcomes and Vaccination Coverage

  • Yoon P
  • Hall J
  • Fuld J
  • et al.
36Citations
Citations of this article
55Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

What is already known about this topic? Analyses of race and ethnicity in COVID-19 data to identify and monitor disparities are complicated by missing or unknown data. What is added by this report? Methods that use more race information when ethnicity information is missing resulted in higher estimated COVID-19 case counts, incidence, and vaccination coverage for most racial groups studied; however, these methods have limitations and warrant further examination of potential bias. What are the implications for public health practice? Ongoing work with experts is needed to identify methods for optimizing race and ethnicity data when data are incomplete. Multiple data sources are needed to monitor disparities and continued efforts are needed to strengthen the reporting of these data, consistent with CDC's Data Modernization Initiative.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yoon, P., Hall, J., Fuld, J., Mattocks, S. L., Lyons, B. C., Bhatkoti, R., … Pillai, S. K. (2021). Alternative Methods for Grouping Race and Ethnicity to Monitor COVID-19 Outcomes and Vaccination Coverage. MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 70(32), 1075–1080. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm7032a2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free