Feasibility of using self-reported ethnicity in pregnancy according to the gestation-related optimal weight classification: a cross-sectional study

17Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the feasibility of self-reported ethnicity using the gestation-related optimal growth (GROW) classification in a contemporary multicultural antenatal population. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Tertiary obstetric hospital in Melbourne, Australia. Population: Pregnant women attending the antenatal clinic. Methods: We surveyed pregnant women during April–June 2016 regarding their understanding of the term ‘ethnicity’, and how they would classify the ethnicity of themselves, their partner, and family members according to the Australian GROW classification. Results: Two hundred and thirty-five women completed the survey. When describing ‘ethnicity’, most women (103, 44%) chose multiple descriptors, most frequently country of birth (54%) and region of ancestry (47%). Interpretation of ‘ethnicity’ varied significantly between ethnic groups: those choosing ‘country of birth’ were more likely to identify as Indian (odds ratio, OR 3.5, P = 0.03), whereas those choosing ‘physical appearance’ were more likely to identify as Chinese (OR 3.0, P = 0.047). Thirty participants (13%) were unable to describe their ethnicity from the available GROW options. Sixty-one (26%) respondents' ethnicity was inconsistent with that of their parents' heritage. A further 35% had a partner of different ethnicity. The agreement between country of birth and self-reported ethnicity was only fair (kappa 0.73, 95% confidence interval, 95% CI 0.64–0.82). Conclusion: This study confirms the complexity of defining ethnicity in contemporary multicultural settings. Self-reported ethnicity is often inaccurate, concepts of ethnicity vary by ethnic group, and country of birth is a poor descriptive surrogate. Adjustment for maternal ethnicity should be undertaken with caution in the customised assessment of fetal growth. Tweetable abstract: Is self-reported maternal ethnicity reliable? We think not.

References Powered by Scopus

Maternal and fetal risk factors for stillbirth: Population based study

691Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Racial/ethnic disparities in obstetric outcomes and care: prevalence and determinants

524Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Small for gestational age: Short stature and beyond

429Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The INTERGROWTH-21 <sup>st</sup> fetal growth standards: toward the global integration of pregnancy and pediatric care

187Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Building consensus and standards in fetal growth restriction studies

70Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Racialized algorithms for kidney function: Erasing social experience

38Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lockie, E., McCarthy, E. A., Hui, L., Churilov, L., & Walker, S. P. (2018). Feasibility of using self-reported ethnicity in pregnancy according to the gestation-related optimal weight classification: a cross-sectional study. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 125(6), 704–709. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.14825

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 12

86%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

7%

Researcher 1

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 7

47%

Nursing and Health Professions 3

20%

Psychology 3

20%

Social Sciences 2

13%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free