Discerning and acknowledging diverse types of feedback in clinical practice–a way to develop feedback literacy

0Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Feedback literacy includes students’ abilities to understand, use and benefit from feedback processes; it is important for the development of self-directed learning, SDL. Considering all of the places where students can potentially learn, especially the clinic, we would argue that feedback has been too narrowly defined. This study aims to explore the different shapes feedback can take for students in their clinical practice. Nursing students at different educational levels were interviewed about their learning after completing a five-week clinical placement within elderly care. Their narratives were explored using a qualitative content analysis of both the manifest and latent content. Interestingly, feedback was shown to be generated by the students themselves: Noticing what others do and what happens on site; Active participation providing first-hand experiences; Getting and taking responsibility; and Understanding what you know and what you need to learn. Although not termed feedback by the students, comparison with their own thoughts, feelings, and behaviours as they observed, participated, and reflected emerged as important to their learning. For this internal feedback to become useful in the development of feedback literacy and SDL, students’ reflections are paramount.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Silén, C., Kilström, D., & Karlgren, K. (2024). Discerning and acknowledging diverse types of feedback in clinical practice–a way to develop feedback literacy. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2024.2369604

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free