Differential innate immune responses of a living skin equivalent model colonized by staphylococcus epidermidis or staphylococcus aureus

80Citations
Citations of this article
143Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Staphylococcus epidermidis is a commensal on skin, whereas Staphylococcus aureus is a transient pathogen. The aim was to determine whether the skin's innate defence systems responded differently to these microorganisms. Differential gene expression of a human skin equivalent (SE) model was assessed by microarray technology, in response to colonization by S. epidermidis or S. aureus. Only a small number of transcripts were significantly (P<0.0001) increased (12) or decreased (35) with gene expression changes of >2-fold on SEs colonized with S. epidermidis compared with controls (no colonization). Expression of one innate defence gene, pentraxin 3 (PTX3), was upregulated, while psoriasin, S100A12, S100A15, β defensin 4, β defensin 3, lipocalin 2 and peptidoglycan recognition protein 2 were downregulated. In contrast, large numbers of transcripts were significantly increased (480) or decreased (397) with gene expression changes of >2-fold on SEs colonized with S. aureus compared with controls. There was upregulation in gene expression of many skin defence factors including Toll-like receptor 2, β defensin 4, properdin, PTX3, proinflammatory cytokines tumour necrosis factor-α, IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-17C, IL-20, IL-23A and chemokines IL-8, CCL4, CCL5, CCL20 and CCL27. These differences may partly explain why S. epidermidis is a normal skin resident and S. aureus is not. © 2008 Federation of European Microbiological Societies. Published by Blackwell Publishing Ltd. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Holland, D. B., Bojar, R. A., Farrar, M. D., & Holland, K. T. (2009). Differential innate immune responses of a living skin equivalent model colonized by staphylococcus epidermidis or staphylococcus aureus. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 290(2), 149–155. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.2008.01402.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free