Deciphering the Brand Value Structure: New Measures and Business Insights

0Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

To assess brand equity and value, research has proposed many brand equity measures, including those based on the customer mind-set, product market (or company), and financial market (Ailawadi, Lehmann, and Neslin 2003; Keller and Lehmann 2006). Both product market-based and financial market-based measures are brand performance outcome-based measures (Ailawadi, Lehmann, and Neslin 2003) that employ brand product market or financial market data to determine utility or dollar values of brands. Compared with customer mind-set measures, that focus on brand equity sources, brand outcome measures provide a single, simple, more “complete,” objective measure of brand performance and are appealing to both marketing and nonmarketing managers (Ailawadi, Lehmann, and Neslin 2003). However, brand outcome measures also suffer from several disadvantages, including lack of diagnostic ability, confusing brand short-term performance and long-term value (i.e., brand asset value), which limit their usefulness in brand research and management.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Huang, C., Wang, F., & Zhang, X. P. S. (2016). Deciphering the Brand Value Structure: New Measures and Business Insights. In Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science (pp. 165–169). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19428-8_46

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free