'Guilty knowledge': Ethical aporia emergent in the research practice of educational development practitioners

6Citations
Citations of this article
50Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Research into the practice of academics serves to inform higher education development (HED) theory and interventions, and is important for the development of the professional knowledge of the HED practitioner. Through such research HED practitioners gain access to what in another context is referred to as 'guilty knowledge'. The complex ethical and methodological challenges faced by HED researchers 'researching in their own backyard' may often be underestimated or overlooked in research proposals and practice. I propose that Heidegger's conceptualisation of aporia may extend our awareness beyond ethical customs and procedures to the underlying ontological nature of research ethics. © 2009 Institute of Education, University of London.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Williams, K. F. (2009). “Guilty knowledge”: Ethical aporia emergent in the research practice of educational development practitioners. London Review of Education, 7(3), 211–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/14748460903290074

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free