Frailty Risk Prediction Model among Older Adults: A Chinese Nation-Wide Cross-Sectional Study

15Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives: Numerous studies have been performed on frailty, but rarely do studies explore the integrated impact of socio-demographic, behavioural and social support factors on frailty. This study aims to establish a comprehensive frailty risk prediction model including multiple risk factors. Methods: The 2018 wave of the Chinese Longevity and Health Longitudinal Survey was used. Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were performed to identify the relationship between frailty and multiple risk factors and establish the frailty risk prediction model. A nomogram was utilized to illustrate the prediction model. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), Hosmer–Lemeshow test and calibration curve were used to appraise the prediction model. Results: Variables from socio-demographic, social support and behavioural dimensions were included in the final frailty risk prediction model. Risk factors include older age, working as professionals and technicians before 60 years old, poor economic condition and poor oral hygiene. Protective factors include eating rice as a staple food, regular exercise, having a spouse as the first person to share thoughts with, doing physical examination once a year and not needing a caregiver when ill. The AUC (0.881), Hosmer–Lemeshow test (p = 0.618), and calibration curve showed that the risk prediction model was valid. Conclusion: Risk factors from socio-demographic, behavioural and social support dimensions had a comprehensive effect on frailty, further supporting that a comprehensive and individualized intervention is necessary to prevent frailty.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Li, S., Fan, W., Zhu, B., Ma, C., Tan, X., & Gu, Y. (2022). Frailty Risk Prediction Model among Older Adults: A Chinese Nation-Wide Cross-Sectional Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(14). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19148410

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free