Telling the same tale twice: Déjà vu and the shades of grey in self-plagiarism

4Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The integrity of medical and scientific publishing depends on responsible and honest practices by authors. Some of the practices that threaten the integrity of scientific publication include publishing the same paper in more than one journal (i.e. duplicate publication), presenting data from one study in multiple small papers (i.e. salami-slicing), copyright infringement, and text recycling [1]. While this subject is of vital interest to authors and investigators, as well as to journal editors and reviewers, it is also relevant to the readership of these publications. This chapter will explore and analyze examples of these practices.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Suárez, A. L., Bernhard, J. D., & Dellavalle, R. P. (2012). Telling the same tale twice: Déjà vu and the shades of grey in self-plagiarism. In Dermatoethics: Contemporary Ethics and Professionalism in Dermatology (pp. 233–236). Springer-Verlag London Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2191-6_38

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free