In this essay, I propose five principles to make U.S. nuclear deterrence policy more just and effective in the future: sever the link between the mass killing of innocent civilians and nuclear deterrence by focusing targeting on adversaries' military power and senior political leadership, not their population; never use or plan to use a nuclear weapon against any target that could be destroyed or neutralized by conventional weapons; reject belligerent reprisal threats against civilians even in response to enemy attacks on one's own or allied civilians; replace nuclear calculated ambiguity threats against biological or cyberattacks with deterrence by denial strategies; and work in good faith toward eventual nuclear disarmament.
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.
CITATION STYLE
Sagan, S. D. (2023). Just and Unjust Nuclear Deterrence. Ethics and International Affairs, 37(1), 19–28. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0892679423000035