Action logic and pure induction

119Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In Floyd-Hoare logic, programs are dynamic while assertions are static (hold at states). In action logic the two notions become one, with programs viewed as on-the-fly assertions whose truth is evaluated along intervals instead of at states. Action logic is an equational theory ACT conservatively extending the equational theory REG of regular expressions with operations preimplication a→b (had a then b) and postimplication b←a (b if-ever a). Unlike REG, ACT is finitely based, makes a* reflexive transitive closure, and has an equivalent Hilbert system. The crucial axiom is that of pure induction, (a→a)* = a→a.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pratt, V. (1991). Action logic and pure induction. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 478 LNAI, pp. 97–120). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0018436

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free