Tracking of oocyte dysmorphisms for ICSI patients may prove relevant to the outcome in subsequent patient cycles

90Citations
Citations of this article
43Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: We determined whether oocyte dysmorphisms, especially repetition of specific dysmorphisms from cycle to cycle, had a prognostic impact on intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) outcome. Methods: ICSI patients (n = 67) were grouped as follows: group 1 >50% phenotypically dysmorphic oocytes per cohort (cytoplasmic and extra-cytoplasmic dysmorphisms) with no repetition of a specific dysmorphism from cycle one to cycle two (36 cycles and 274 oocytes); group 2 >50% dysmorphic oocytes per cohort and repetition of the same dysmorphism from cycle one to cycle two (32 cycles and 313 oocytes); group 3 (control) <30% dysmorphic oocytes (33 cycles and 378 oocytes). Results: In group 2 (repetitive), 47% of oocytes were observed to have organelle clustering versus 20.5% in group 1 and 17.3% in group 3 (P < 0.001). There was no difference between the groups in fertilization rates, cleavage rates or embryo quality. Embryos derived from normal oocytes were transferred in each group (57, 33 and 72% respectively). The clinical pregnancy and implantation rates in group 2 (3.1 and 1.7% respectively) were lower (P < 0.01, P = 0.005) than both group 1 (28 and 15% respectively) and group 3 (45.5 and 26.5% respectively). Conclusions: The low implantation rate in group 2, even though 33% of transferred embryos were derived from morphologically normal oocytes, suggests that repetitive organelle clustering may be associated with an underlying adverse factor affecting the entire follicular cohort.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Meriano, J. S., Alexis, J., Visram-Zaver, S., Cruz, M., & Casper, R. F. (2001). Tracking of oocyte dysmorphisms for ICSI patients may prove relevant to the outcome in subsequent patient cycles. Human Reproduction, 16(10), 2118–2123. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/16.10.2118

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free