Effect of changing work stressors and coping resources on the risk of type 2 diabetes: The OHSPIW cohort study

10Citations
Citations of this article
77Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Little is known about the relationship between changing psychosocial work conditions and type 2 diabetes. We determined whether changing work stressors and coping resources affect the risk of type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS In this prospective cohort (2003-2014) of 3,740 workers without diabetes (OHSPIW [Occupational Health Study of PetroleumIndustryWorkers]), participants completed an evaluation of work-related stress and coping resources and type 2 diabetes diagnosis at baseline and 12 years follow-up (two waves). The changes in work stressors and coping resources were measured with the Occupation Stress Inventory- Revised and the Instrument for Stress-Related Job Analysis (Version 6.0). Type 2 diabetes was diagnosed on the basis of an oral glucose tolerance test supplemented by physician report. RESULTS Increased task stressors (relative risk [RR] 1.57 [95% CI 1.03-2.63]) and decreased coping resources (RR 1.68 [95% CI 1.02-2.83]) were associated with risk of type 2 diabetes. The main risk factors were increased role overload, increased role insufficiency, increased physical environment stressors, decreased self-care, and decreased rational coping. Increased coping resources also had a buffering effect on increased task stressors and type 2 diabetes. CONCLUSIONS Changes in work stressors and coping resources have an influence on the risk for type 2 diabetes, highlighting the importance of preventivemeasures against adverse psychosocial work conditions and reduced coping resources for diabetes prevention in the workplace.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lian, Y., Sun, Q., Guan, S., Ge, H., Tao, N., Jiang, Y., … Liu, J. (2018). Effect of changing work stressors and coping resources on the risk of type 2 diabetes: The OHSPIW cohort study. Diabetes Care, 41(3), 453–460. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc17-0749

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free