The Correlative Strength of Objective Physical Assessment against the ECOG Performance Status Assessment in Individuals Diagnosed with Cancer

12Citations
Citations of this article
49Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Individuals with cancer experience loss of function and disability due to disease and cancer-related treatments. Physical fitness and frailty influence treatment plans and may predict cancer outcomes. Outcome measures currently used may not provide sufficiently comprehensive assessment of physical performance. Objective: The objectives of this study are to: (1) describe the development of a functional measure, the Bellarmine Norton Assessment Tool (BNAT), for individuals with cancer; and (2) assess the relationship between the BNAT and the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status, a commonly used classification system by oncologists. Design: This was a prospective cohort correlation study. Methods: The BNAT encompasses 1 self-reported physical activity question and 4 objective tests: 2-Minute Step Test, 30-Second Sit to Stand, Timed Arm Curl, and Timed Up and Go. The BNAT score and its components were compared with ECOG Performance Status scores assigned by oncologists and analyzed for correlation and agreement. Results: A total of 103 male and female individuals (ages 33-87 years) with various cancer diagnoses participated. The mean (SD) ECOG Performance Status score was 0.95 (0.87), range 0 to 3, and the mean BNAT score was 14.9 (4.3), range 5 to 24. Spearman agreement association of BNAT and ECOG Performance Status scores revealed a significant moderate negative relationship (r =-0.568). Limitations: The BNAT was compared with the ECOG Performance Status, a commonly used but subjective measure. Additionally, a common data set was used for both deriving and evaluating the BNAT performance scale. Conclusions: There was a moderate negative linear relationship of BNAT to ECOG Performance Status scores across all participants. Utilization of the BNAT may reflect overall physical performance and provide comprehensive and meaningful detail to influence therapeutic decisions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Quinn, S. E., Crandell, C. E., Blake, M. E., Bontrager, A. M., Dempsey, A. G., Lewis, D. J., … Wingard, C. J. (2020). The Correlative Strength of Objective Physical Assessment against the ECOG Performance Status Assessment in Individuals Diagnosed with Cancer. Physical Therapy, 100(3), 416–428. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzz192

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free