Benchmarks and standards for the evaluation of parallel job schedulers

97Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The evaluation of parallel job schedulers hinges on the workloads used. It is suggested that this be standardized, in terms of both format and content, so as to ease the evaluation and comparison of different systems. The question remains whether this can encompass both traditional parallel systems and metacomputing systems. This paper is based on a panel on this subject that was held at the workshop, and the ensuing discussion; its authors are both the panel members and participants from the audience. Naturally, not all of us agree with all the opinions expressed here...

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chapin, S. J., Cirne, W., Feitelson, D. G., Jones, J. P., Leutenegger, S. T., Schwiegelshohn, U., … Talby, D. (1999). Benchmarks and standards for the evaluation of parallel job schedulers. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 1659, pp. 67–90). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-47954-6_4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free