Sample size determination for proving equivalence based on the ratio of two means for normally distributed data

76Citations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Equivalence trials aim to demonstrate that two treatments do not differ by more than a prespecified clinically irrelevant amount. We consider the problem when equivalence is defined in terms of the ratio of population means and the original (untransformed) data are normally distributed. Application of the intersection-union principle to the test proposed by Sasabuchi results in a two one-sided tests procedure of size α. We give the associated 100 (1 - 2α) per cent confidence interval and derive the exact methods for calculation of power and sample sizes for the parallel group design and the two-period cross-over. We present tables and figures of required sample sizes and achieved power.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hauschke, D., Kieser, M., Diletti, E., & Burke, M. (1999). Sample size determination for proving equivalence based on the ratio of two means for normally distributed data. Statistics in Medicine, 18(1), 93–105. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19990115)18:1<93::AID-SIM992>3.0.CO;2-8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free