CPAP pressure for prediction of oral appliance treatment response in obstructive sleep apnea

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
131Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives: Mandibular advancement splints (MAS) are often preferred to CPAP treatment for OSA but are not always equally efficacious. High therapeutic CPAP pressure has been associated with MAS treatment failure in a Japanese population. We sought to assess the relationship between CPAP pressure and MAS treatment response in an Australian population. Methods: Therapeutic CPAP pressure and MAS treatment response were obtained from a one-month crossover trial of both treatments. Predictive utility of CPAP pressure to identify MAS treatment response was assessed. Results: Seventy-eight OSA patients were included (age 49.3 ± 11.1 years, BMI 29.1 ± 5.8 kg/m2) with predominantly moderate-severe OSA (AHI 30.0 ± 12.7/h). CPAP pressure was lower in MAS responders (MAS AHI < 10/h) 9.7 ± 1.6 vs. 11.7 ± 2.4 cm H2O, p < 0.01, with area under ROC curve of 0.74 (95% Cl 0.63-0.86), p < 0.01. The best cutoff value of 10.5 cm H2O useful for discriminating MAS responders and non-responders in the previous Japanese population was inadequate for prediction in the current population (0.47 negative predictive value [NPV]). However a cutoff of 13 cm H2O identified MAS non-responders (1.0 NPV). Multivariate regression identified CPAP pressure (odds ratio [95% confidence interval] 0.53 [0.33-0.87], age (0.93 [0.87-0.99]) and AHI (0.92 [0.86-0.97]) as predictors of MAS treatment response (model r2= 0.54, p < 0.001). Conclusions: In Australian patients, the majority of whom are Caucasian, a higher therapeutic CPAP pressure requirement in conjunction with age and OSA severity characteristics may be useful to indicate likelihood of success with MAS as an alternative therapy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sutherland, K., Phillips, C. L., Davies, A., Srinivasan, V. K., Dalci, O., Yee, B. J., … Cistulli, P. A. (2014). CPAP pressure for prediction of oral appliance treatment response in obstructive sleep apnea. Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, 10(9), 943–949. https://doi.org/10.5664/jcsm.4020

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free