Four-year evolution of a thrombophylaxis protocol in an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program: Recent results in 485 patients

9Citations
Citations of this article
45Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

"Enhanced recovery after surgery" (ERAS) protocols may reduce morbidity, length of hospital stay (LOS), and costs. During the 4-year evolution of a bariatric ERAS protocol, we found that administration of thrombophylaxis selectively to high-risk morbidly obese patients (assessed postoperatively by Caprini score ≥ 3) undergoing omega loop gastric bypass ("mini" gastric bypass) or sleeve gastrectomy resulted in safe outcomes. Both procedures proved equally effective with this protocol. The vast majority of rapidly mobilized, low-risk patients did not appear to require antithrombotic heparin. Similar to other reported ERAS outcomes, our recent year’s results in 485 patients included a mean LOS of 1.08 ± 0.64 days (range 1–14), with 460 (95.0%) discharged on day 1 and 99.6% by day 2. There were 13 30-day complications (2.7%), two reinterventions (0.4%), and no hemorrhages.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Blanchet, M. C., Frering, V., Gignoux, B., Matussière, Y., Oudar, P., Noël, R., & Mirabaud, A. (2018). Four-year evolution of a thrombophylaxis protocol in an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program: Recent results in 485 patients. Obesity Surgery, 28(7), 2140–2144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-018-3299-4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free