Sex differences in clinical course and intensive care unit admission in a national cohort of hospitalized patients with COVID-19

8Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Males have a higher risk for an adverse outcome of COVID-19. The aim of the study was to analyze sex differences in the clinical course with focus on patients who received intensive care. Research was conducted as an observational retrospective cohort study. A group of 23,235 patients from 83 hospitals with PCR-confirmed infection with SARS-CoV-2 between 4 February 2020 and 22 March 2021 were included. Data on symptoms were retrieved from a separate registry, which served as a routine infection control system. Males accounted for 51.4% of all included patients. Males received more intensive care (ratio OR = 1.61, 95% CI = 1.51-1.71) and mechanical ventilation (invasive or noninvasive, OR = 1.87, 95% CI = 1.73-2.01). A model for the prediction of mortality showed that until the age 60 y, mortality increased with age with no substantial difference between sexes. After 60 y, the risk of death increased more in males than in females. At 90 y, females had a predicted mortality risk of 31%, corresponding to males of 84 y. In the intensive care unit (ICU) cohort, females of 90 y had a mortality risk of 46%, equivalent to males of 72 y. Seventy-five percent of males over 90 died, but only 46% of females of the same age. In conclusion, the sex gap was most evident among the oldest in the ICU. Understanding sex-determined differences in COVID-19 can be useful to facilitate individualized treatments.

References Powered by Scopus

A modification of the elixhauser comorbidity measures into a point system for hospital death using administrative data

1687Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Male sex identified by global COVID-19 meta-analysis as a risk factor for death and ITU admission

1021Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Sex- and age-based differences in the delivery and outcomes of critical care

224Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Angiographic and clinical outcome of SARS-CoV-2 positive patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary angioplasty: A collaborative, individual patient data meta-analysis of six registry-based studies

13Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Impact of timing and combination of different BNT162b2 and ChAdOx1-S COVID-19 basic and booster vaccinations on humoral immunogenicity and reactogenicity in adults

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

An Evaluation of Non-Communicable Diseases and Risk Factors Associated with COVID-19 Disease Severity in Dubai, United Arab Emirates: An Observational Retrospective Study

4Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nachtigall, I., Bonsignore, M., Thürmann, P., Hohenstein, S., Jóźwiak, K., Hauptmann, M., … Meier-Hellmann, A. (2021). Sex differences in clinical course and intensive care unit admission in a national cohort of hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 10(21). https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10214954

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

71%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

14%

Researcher 1

14%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 4

57%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 1

14%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

14%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

14%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free