Between Anthropology and History: The Entangled Lives of Jangarh Singh Shyam and Jagdish Swaminathan

2Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The focus of this chapter is the relationship between Jagdish Swaminathan (1928–1994), a Tamil Brahmin artist-critic and institution builder, and Jangarh Singh Shyam (early 1960s to 2001), a Gond Adivasi artist often said to have been ‘discovered’ by the former. To make this relation thinkable, the chapter introduces a historiographical distinction between primitivism and indigenism, referring to different ways by which the subaltern is addressed in history (as extension of primordial population and contemporary individual respectively). Taking the collapse of the Nehruvian system in general (mid-1960s to mid-1970s) and the Emergency in India (1975–1977) in particular, as the historical threshold between these two regimes of governmentality, the chapter also tries to expose the larger nihilistic and even self-destructive schemata within which Shyam and Swaminathan operated (of which the most extreme manifestation could be seen in Shyam’s alleged suicide in Japan).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Luis, S. K. (2019). Between Anthropology and History: The Entangled Lives of Jangarh Singh Shyam and Jagdish Swaminathan. In Intersections of contemporary art, anthropology and art history in South Asia (pp. 139–179). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05852-4_6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free