Dissimilatory nitrate reduction pathways in an oligotrophic freshwater ecosystem: spatial and temporal trends

  • Washbourne I
  • Crenshaw C
  • Baker M
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Elevated nitrate (NO(3)(-)) concentrations can cause eutrophication, which may lead to harmful algal blooms, loss of habitat and reduction in biodiversity. Denitrification, a dissimilatory process that removes NO(3)(-) mainly as dinitrogen gas (N(2)), is believed to be the dominant NO(3)(-) removal pathway in aquatic ecosystems. Evidence suggests that a less well-studied process, dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium (DNRA), which retains nitrogen (N) in the system, may also be important under favorable conditions. Using stable isotope tracers in sealed microcosms, we measured the potential for NO(3)(-) losses due to DNRA and denitrification in an oligotrophic freshwater ecosystem. We took sediment and water samples at runoff and baseflow, across several ecotypes. Our objective was to quantify the relative importance of DNRA compared to denitrification with changes in ecotype and season. Potential denitrification rates ranged from 0 to 0.14 +/- 0.03 mu gN gAFDM(-1) d(-1). Potential DNRA rates ranged from 0 to 0.0051 +/- 0.0008 mu gN gAFDM(-1) d(-1). Denitrification losses peaked at the inflow stream ecotype at 96.2% of total dissimilatory NO(3)(-) removal, whereas losses due to DNRA peaked in the lake ecotype at 34.4%. When averaged over the entire system, denitrification peaked at baseflow (31.2%), while DNRA peaked at runoff (2.9%). Although NO(3)(-) transformations due to denitrification were higher than DNRA in all ecotype and temporal comparisons, our results suggest that DNRA is also important under favorable conditions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Washbourne, I., Crenshaw, C., & Baker, M. (2011). Dissimilatory nitrate reduction pathways in an oligotrophic freshwater ecosystem: spatial and temporal trends. Aquatic Microbial Ecology, 65(1), 55–64. https://doi.org/10.3354/ame01538

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free