A devil's advocate on SIL 4

1Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The concept of safety integrity levels is well established and for many safety critical systems SIL 4 is demanded by default. The problem with SIL 4 is that it is impossible to prove and the demand is often not justified. A devil's advocate view is adopted and a number of questions related to demanding SIL 4 are asked and the problems to be addressed when answering them are discussed. © Springer-Verlag London Limited 2012.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nordland, O. (2012). A devil’s advocate on SIL 4. In Achieving Systems Safety - Proceedings of the 20th Safety-Critical Systems Symposium, SSS 2012 (pp. 285–292). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2494-8_20

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free