Recall cues interfere with retrieval from visuospatial working memory

14Citations
Citations of this article
49Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Visuospatial working memory allows us to hold multiple visual objects over short delays. It is typically tested by presenting an array of objects, then after a delay showing a ‘probe’ indicating which memory item to recall or reproduce by adjusting a target feature. However, recent studies demonstrate that information at the time of probe can disrupt recall. Here, in three experiments we test whether traditional memory probes, which contain features that compete with the feature to be recalled, may themselves interfere with performance. We asked participants to report the direction of one of the several coloured arrows in memory, based on its colour. First, we demonstrate that recall is better when the probe is initially just a coloured dot, rather than a coloured arrow which has to be adjusted to match orientation memory, consistent with interference from features of the probe itself. Second, this interference is present even when a mask follows the memory array, suggesting that the interference does not work by degrading immediate or iconic memory. Finally, when items are shown sequentially, the first and last items are invulnerable to probe interference. Our findings support recent theories of associative recall, in which probes reactivate features in WM, retrieving information by pattern completion.

References Powered by Scopus

Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs

2160Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Default Bayes factors for ANOVA designs

1355Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Discrete fixed-resolution representations in visual working memory

1270Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Neural mechanisms of attending to items in working memory

108Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Allocation of resources in working memory: Theoretical and empirical implications for visual search

33Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Frontoparietal theta tACS nonselectively enhances encoding, maintenance, and retrieval stages in visuospatial working memory

20Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tabi, Y. A., Husain, M., & Manohar, S. G. (2019). Recall cues interfere with retrieval from visuospatial working memory. In British Journal of Psychology (Vol. 110, pp. 288–305). John Wiley and Sons Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12374

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 15

68%

Researcher 4

18%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

9%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 14

48%

Neuroscience 13

45%

Computer Science 1

3%

Engineering 1

3%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free