The Holocaust in Israeli Political Culture: Four Constructions and Their Consequences: Editor’s Note: This Article is Followed by Four Comments and a Response by Ian Lustick

16Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The collective memory of the Holocaust among Israeli Jews has featured competition among four related but distinct constructions: Zionist Proof-text; Wasting Asset; Object Lesson for safeguarding human rights; and Template for Jewish life. This paper will analyze this competition and the implications of the apparent victory of the Template. While there is a sequence to the changing prominence of these different versions of the Holocaust, each version has enjoyed periods of relative success since World War II. In recent decades, however, the Holocaust as a Template for Jewish Life has emerged as ascendant. Throughout, competition among the four constructions was driven by parochial and temporary political interests and by the unintended consequences of dissatisfactions associated with any one of them. My analysis will trace this competition and those consequences, using them to explain the extreme and highly particular features of current Israeli Jewish collective memory of the Holocaust. The paper concludes with an assessment of the implications of the hegemonic status of this version of the Holocaust for appreciating Israel’s contemporary political predicament.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lustick, I. S. (2017). The Holocaust in Israeli Political Culture: Four Constructions and Their Consequences: Editor’s Note: This Article is Followed by Four Comments and a Response by Ian Lustick. Contemporary Jewry, 37(1), 125–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12397-017-9208-7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free