The original sin (and salvation) of functionalism

Abstract

This Comment interrogates the central and determining role accorded to functionalism in Jan Klabbers' account of international organizations (IOs) law in his recent article, 'The EJIL Foreword: The Transformation of International Organizations Law'. Specifically, it expresses doubts regarding Klabbers' designation of functionalism as the dominant, paradigmatic theory of IOs law; questions whether the article's account of functionalism's historical origins is persuasive; and argues that the 'rise and fall' narrative set forth in the article presents an overly sanitized picture of IOs law, largely free from political struggle. The development of IOs law has been more contested than Klabbers' narrative suggests; minimizing that contestation carries the danger of closing off possibilities for reimagining IOs law today.