Lumiracoxib for acute postoperative dental pain: A systematic review of randomized clinical trials

6Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Lumiracoxib is an anti-inflammatory drug that has been used to treat acute dental pain, mainly in post surgical settings, in which the greatest levels of pain and discomfort are experienced during the first 24 hours. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of lumira-coxib for treating acute post surgical dental pain. DESIGN AND SETTING: Systematic review developed at the Brazilian Cochrane Centre, Universidade Federal de São Paulo. METHODS: An electronic search was conducted in the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Lilacs (Literatura Latino-Americana e do Caribe em Ciências da Saúde), SciELO (Scientific Electronic Library Online) and Embase databases. A manual search was also performed. Only randomized controlled trials were included, and these were selected and assessed by two researchers with regard to the risk of bias. RESULTS: Three clinical trials with 921 participants were included. Lumiracoxib 400 mg produced onset of analgesia in a shorter time than shown by lumira-coxib 100 mg, celecoxib 200 mg and ibu-profen 400 mg. There was no difference between lumira-coxib 400 mg and rofecoxib 50 mg. In two studies, the mean time taken to attain onset of analgesia for the placebo was not estimated because the number of participants who reached onset was too small. CONCLUSION: There is evidence with a moderate risk of bias that recommends the use of lumira-coxib for acute postoperative dental pain. However, the adverse effects are not completely known. Given that lumira-coxib is currently available in only three countries, further studies are likely to be rare and discouraged.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Silva, R. C. L., Riera, R., & Saconato, H. (2011). Lumiracoxib for acute postoperative dental pain: A systematic review of randomized clinical trials. Sao Paulo Medical Journal, 129(5), 335–345. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1516-31802011000500009

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free