A randomized controlled feasibility trial of metacognitive training with adolescents receiving treatment for anorexia nervosa

4Citations
Citations of this article
54Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: This pilot study investigated the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of the metacognitive training for eating disorders (MCT-ED) program in adolescents with anorexia nervosa (AN). We report attrition and subjective evaluation as well as changes to cognitive flexibility, perfectionism and eating disorder pathology relative to waitlist controls. Method: Female (n = 35, aged 13–17 years) outpatients with a diagnosis of AN (n = 20) or atypical AN (n = 15) completed baseline measures of cognitive flexibility, perfectionism, and eating disorder pathology (May 2020–May 2022). Participants were randomly allocated to either treatment-as-usual (TAU) plus MCT-ED or TAU waitlist condition. All participants completed post-intervention and 3-month follow-up questionnaires. Results: The MCT-ED condition had a treatment attrition rate <15%. Participants provided positive evaluation of the program. There were large between groups differences favoring MCT-ED at post-intervention and 3-month follow-up for concern over mistakes perfectionism (respective ds = −1.25, 95% CI [−2.06, −.45]; −.83, 95% CI [−1.60,.06]) with a significant group difference post-intervention but not 3-month follow-up. Discussion: Findings provide tentative support for the feasibility of MCT-ED as an adjunct intervention for young people with AN, however replication is needed with a larger sample size to further explore its efficacy. Public significance: Metacognitive training for eating disorders (MCT-ED) is a feasible adjunct intervention for adolescents with anorexia nervosa. The intervention, which targets thinking styles and is delivered online by a therapist, received positive feedback, had high treatment retention, and led to reductions in perfectionism by the end of treatment compared to wait-list controls. Although these gains were not sustained long-term, the program is suitable adjunct intervention for young people with eating disorders.

References Powered by Scopus

Using thematic analysis in psychology

110426Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: A practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs

6585Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A systematic review of dropout from treatment in outpatients with anorexia nervosa

173Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

A randomised controlled evaluation of an online perfectionism intervention for people with disordered eating–how perfect does it need to be?

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Clinicians' confidence in diagnosing atypical anorexia nervosa: An experimental study of the role of patient and clinician characteristics

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Metacognitive Interventions for mental health disorders in adolescents: a scoping review protocol

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Balzan, R. P., Gilder, M., Thompson, M., & Wade, T. D. (2023). A randomized controlled feasibility trial of metacognitive training with adolescents receiving treatment for anorexia nervosa. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 56(9), 1820–1825. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.24009

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

57%

Researcher 2

29%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

14%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 5

56%

Nursing and Health Professions 2

22%

Medicine and Dentistry 1

11%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 1

11%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 3

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free