“Good judges” in civil procedure: dogma and neuroscience

Abstract

In this article, the models of what can be understood as “good judges” in civil procedure are called into question. These models are brought to light with the different perspectives regarding the ends of this process. From this point of view, the challenges and limitations that we face as human beings in fulfill-ing our jurisdictional duties are evident. It is regarding these restrictions that neuroscience can prove to be useful through neurotechnology as a mechanism which, among other possibilities, may favour cognitive improvement. The use of such technology has achieved advances in other professions, and it is a valid question as to whether it can assist judges in improving their performance.