Bacterial isolates from diabetic foot ulcers and their antimicrobial resistance profile from selected hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

24Citations
Citations of this article
132Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduction: Infected diabetic foot ulcer (IDFU) is a worldwide problem associated with diabetes mellitus. It could lead from soft tissue infection to bone infection and is a leading cause of lower limb amputation. Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria, including anaerobic bacteria and fungi, are considered potential causes of infection. The early diagnosis of DFU infection and appropriate treatment based on the identification of the pathogens and their antimicrobial susceptibility pattern is important for good prognosis. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to isolate the bacteria that infect foot ulcers in selected Hospitals and determine their antimicrobial resistance profile. Method: An institutional-based multicenter, cross-sectional study was conducted in selected Hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, from November 2020 to May 2021. A sterile swab was used to collect samples from the foot ulcer and a sterile needle to collect pus. Isolates were identified by culture, Gram-staining, and a series of biochemical tests. For each bacterial species identified, the antibiotic profiling was determined by the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method. Results: one hundred and twenty-seven pathogenic bacteria were isolated from samples taken from 130 patients with a diabetic foot ulcer. Sixty-eight percent had growth of multiple microorganisms. Two-thirds (66.7%) of the isolates were gram-negative bacteria. The predominant bacterial species were S. aureus 25.19% (32/127), Pseudomonas species 18.89% (24/127), and Escherichia coli 16.53% (21/127). Overall, 92.9% (118/127) of the isolates were identified as multi-drug resistant. Gram-positive isolates were susceptible to chloramphenicol, clindamycin, and amikacin. Gram-negative isolates were also sensitive to chloramphenicol, aztreonam, and amikacin. Conclusion: The majority of bacteria isolated from patients presenting with Diabetic foot ulcer infections were found to be multi-drug resistant in the study sites of the current study. The results demonstrate the importance of timely identification of infection of diabetic foot ulcers, proper sample collection for identification of the pathogens and for determining their antibiotic susceptibility pattern before initiating antimicrobial treatment.

References Powered by Scopus

Diabetic foot ulcers and their recurrence

2589Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

2012 infectious diseases society of America clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of diabetic foot infections

1422Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Global epidemiology of diabetic foot ulceration: a systematic review and meta-analysis<sup>†</sup>

1112Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Infected Diabetic Wound Regeneration Using Peptide-Modified Chiral Dressing to Target Revascularization

47Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Diabetic Foot Complications: A Retrospective Cohort Study

13Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Detection of class 1 integron and antibiotic resistance of β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli isolated from four hospitals in Babylon, Iraq

12Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Atlaw, A., Kebede, H. B., Abdela, A. A., & Woldeamanuel, Y. (2022). Bacterial isolates from diabetic foot ulcers and their antimicrobial resistance profile from selected hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Frontiers in Endocrinology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.987487

Readers over time

‘22‘23‘24‘25015304560

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 18

60%

Lecturer / Post doc 6

20%

Researcher 4

13%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 9

32%

Nursing and Health Professions 7

25%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6

21%

Medicine and Dentistry 6

21%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0