The Rights of Nature as a Bridge between Land-Ownership Regimes: The Potential of Institutionalized Interplay in Post-Colonial Societies

6Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Despite the growing prominence and use of Rights of Nature (RoN), doubts remain as to their tangible effect on environmental protection efforts. By analyzing two initiatives in postcolonial societies, we argue that they do influence the creation of institutionalized bridges between differing land-ownership regimes. Applying the methodology of inter-legality, we examine the Ecuadorian Constitution of 2008 and the Ugandan National Environment Act 2019. We identify five normative spheres that influence land-ownership regimes. We find that the established Ecuadorian RoN have an institutionalized effect on the nation’s legal system. Their more recently established Ugandan counterpart shows potential to develop in the same direction.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Putzer, A., Lambooy, T., Breemer, I., & Rietveld, A. (2022). The Rights of Nature as a Bridge between Land-Ownership Regimes: The Potential of Institutionalized Interplay in Post-Colonial Societies. In Transnational Environmental Law (Vol. 11, pp. 501–523). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2047102522000334

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free