Despite the growing prominence and use of Rights of Nature (RoN), doubts remain as to their tangible effect on environmental protection efforts. By analyzing two initiatives in postcolonial societies, we argue that they do influence the creation of institutionalized bridges between differing land-ownership regimes. Applying the methodology of inter-legality, we examine the Ecuadorian Constitution of 2008 and the Ugandan National Environment Act 2019. We identify five normative spheres that influence land-ownership regimes. We find that the established Ecuadorian RoN have an institutionalized effect on the nation’s legal system. Their more recently established Ugandan counterpart shows potential to develop in the same direction.
CITATION STYLE
Putzer, A., Lambooy, T., Breemer, I., & Rietveld, A. (2022). The Rights of Nature as a Bridge between Land-Ownership Regimes: The Potential of Institutionalized Interplay in Post-Colonial Societies. In Transnational Environmental Law (Vol. 11, pp. 501–523). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2047102522000334
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.