Energy audit as an input for energy management and energy efficiency improvement in a gypsum manufacturing plant

0Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper aims at presenting the main results of an energy audit performed to a gypsum production plant, in Portugal, which due to the amount of energy consumed must comply with the Portuguese program SGCIE (Intensive Energy Consumption Management System). The program was created in 2008 to promote energy efficiency and energy consumption monitoring in intensive energy consuming facilities (energy consumption higher than 500 toe per year). Facilities operators are required to perform energy audits and take actions to draw up an action plan for energy efficiency, establishing targets for energy consumption reduction and greenhouse gases emissions indexes. An energy audit was carried out to identify potential energy conservation measures for improving energy efficiency, and also typical energy consumption patterns, sector/equipment load profiles and thermal equipment performance. This tool gives managers the information to support decision making on improving energy performance and reducing greenhouse gas emissions. A number of tangible targets and measures were devised and set to be implemented in the next few years. Results show that there is a considerable potential for reduction in the energy consumption and greenhouse gases emissions of gypsum manufacturing plants. Here, as elsewhere in the industrial sector, energy efficiency can only be achieved through a continuous energy monitoring and management system.

References Powered by Scopus

This article is free to access.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bernardo, H., Oliveira, F., & Serrano, L. (2015). Energy audit as an input for energy management and energy efficiency improvement in a gypsum manufacturing plant. Renewable Energy and Power Quality Journal, 1(13), 804–808. https://doi.org/10.24084/repqj13.515

Readers over time

‘15‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

33%

Researcher 3

33%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

22%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Energy 3

38%

Engineering 2

25%

Business, Management and Accounting 2

25%

Computer Science 1

13%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0