Vocabulary Acquisition Strategies & Language Aptitude

1Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

According to the lexical approach in language teaching, it is lexis which functions as the most important building block for communication. Therefore, it is of great importance to examine how vocabulary, also in the form of multiword lexical units, can be acquired most efficiently. Vocabulary learning strategies haven been a constant field of research since the 1970s, providing linguists and teachers with information about different cognitive vocabulary learning strategies. Additionally, language aptitude tests improved significantly since their development and were able to prove their validity. Studies showed that low aptitude learners drastically improved with the help of specific vocabulary acquisition strategies, whereas high aptitude learners did not benefit from such strategies. Taking this finding into consideration, this research investigates whether people with a lower language aptitude use particular cognitive strategies more frequently compared to persons with a higher aptitude. A questionnaire has been designed to measure people’s preferences for various cognitive vocabulary acquisition strategies. The questionnaire focuses on three well known and two little-known, but innovative, strategies: learning vocabulary with the help of pictorial representations, grouping corresponding words together, antonyms and synonyms, using physical actions accompanying vocabulary learning and the keyword method. A total of 19 German native speakers participated in the study. The LLAMA B test has been chosen to measure vocabulary acquisition aptitude. The research shows that low aptitude learners do not use significantly more cognitive vocabulary acquisition strategies than high aptitude learners.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Poschner, J. (2018). Vocabulary Acquisition Strategies & Language Aptitude. In English Language Education (Vol. 16, pp. 245–259). Springer Science and Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91917-1_13

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free