Age standardisation - An indigenous standard?

50Citations
Citations of this article
79Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The study of inequities in health is a critical component of monitoring government obligations to uphold the rights of Indigenous Peoples. In Aotearoa/New Zealand the indigenous Māori population has a substantially younger age structure than the non-indigenous population making it necessary to account for age differences when comparing population health outcomes. An age-standardised rate is a summary measure of a rate that a population would have if it had a standard age structure. Changing age standards have stimulated interest in the potential impact of population standards on disparities data and consequently on health policy. This paper compares the age structure of the Māori and non-Māori populations with two standard populations commonly used in New Zealand: Segi's world and WHO world populations. The performance of these standards in Māori and non-Māori mortality data was then measured against the use of the Māori population as a standard. It was found that the choice of population standard affects the magnitude of mortality rates, rate ratios and rate differences, the relative ranking of causes of death, and the relative width of confidence intervals. This in turn will affect the monitoring of trends in health outcomes and health policy decision-making. It is concluded that the choice of age standard has political implications and the development and utilisation of an international indigenous population standard should be considered. © 2007 Robson et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

References Powered by Scopus

Unequal Treatment: Confronting Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care (with CD)

7349Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Look before you leap: Stratify before you standardize

34Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Changing to the 2000 standard million: Are declining racial/ethnic and socioeconomic inequalities in health real progress or statistical illusion?

27Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Cancer disparities in indigenous Polynesian populations: Māori, Native Hawaiians, and Pacific people

75Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Mortality and hospitalisation costs of rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease in New Zealand

51Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Research Methods in Community Medicine: Surveys, Epidemiological Research, Programme Evaluation, Clinical Trials: Sixth Edition

39Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Robson, B., Purdie, G., Cram, F., & Simmonds, S. (2007). Age standardisation - An indigenous standard? Emerging Themes in Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-7622-4-3

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 35

60%

Researcher 13

22%

Professor / Associate Prof. 6

10%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 30

59%

Social Sciences 9

18%

Nursing and Health Professions 8

16%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free