Mycorrhizal response in crop versus wild plants

16Citations
Citations of this article
86Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We proposed a theoretical framework predicting mutualistic outcomes for the arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) symbiosis based on host provenance (crop versus wild). To test the framework, we grew two isolates of Rhizoglomus irregulare (commercial versus an isolate locally isolated), with five crop plants and five wild plants endemic to the region that co-occur with the locally sourced fungus. While inoculation with either isolate had no effect on plant biomass, it decreased leaf P content, particularly for wild plants. All plants associating with the commercial fungus had lower leaf P. Overall, our data shows that wild plants may be more sensitive to differences in mutualistic quality among fungal isolates.

References Powered by Scopus

Get full text
6906Citations
1460Readers
Get full text

This article is free to access.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Get full text
24Citations
198Readers
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kokkoris, V., Hamel, C., & Hart, M. M. (2019). Mycorrhizal response in crop versus wild plants. PLoS ONE, 14(8). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221037

Readers over time

‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2509182736

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 22

43%

Researcher 16

31%

Professor / Associate Prof. 8

16%

Lecturer / Post doc 5

10%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 40

80%

Environmental Science 4

8%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 4

8%

Medicine and Dentistry 2

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0