Why Don’t Scientists Follow the Water Footprint Assessment Manual? Example of One Study

0Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

A recently published study by Parra-Orobio et al. looked at a water footprint assessment in low-income urban neighborhoods from developing countries; specifically, this is a case study of the Fátima site in the municipality of Gamarra, Colombia. However, that study deviates significantly from the water footprint methodology described in the Water Footprint Assessment Manual. Therefore, the results of the study cannot be compared with similar studies. In this Letter to the Editors, different parts of the application of the water footprint methodology used in the mentioned study are analyzed and several main deviations from the standard water footprint methodology are pointed out. It is, therefore, suggested that the authors of the article “Assessment of the Water Footprint in Low-Income Urban Neighborhoods from Developing Countries: Case Study Fátima (Gamarra, Colombia)” should expand or modify this article to clarify any deviations from the standard water footprint methodology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ansorge, L. (2023). Why Don’t Scientists Follow the Water Footprint Assessment Manual? Example of One Study. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129249

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free