Glycemic control in cardiac surgery: Implementing an evidence-based insulin infusion protocol

11Citations
Citations of this article
96Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background Acute hyperglycemia following cardiac surgery increases the risk of deep sternal wound infection, significant early morbidity, and mortality. Insulin infusion protocols that target tight glycemic control to treat hyperglycemia have been linked to hypoglycemia and increased mortality. Recently published studies examining glycemic control in critical illness and clinical practice guidelines from professional organizations support moderate glycemic control. Objectives To measure critical care nurses' knowledge of glycemic control in cardiac surgery before and after education. To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of an evidence-based insulin infusion protocol targeting moderate glycemic control in cardiac surgery patients. Methods This evidence-based practice change was implemented in the cardiovascular unit in a community teaching hospital. Nurses completed a self-developed questionnaire to measure knowledge of glycemic control. Blood glucose data, collected (retrospectively) from anesthesia end time through 11:59 PM on postoperative day 2, were compared from 2 months before to 2 months after the practice change. Results Nurses' knowledge (test scores) increased significantly after education (pretest mean = 53.10, SD = 11.75; posttest mean = 79.10, SD = 12.02; t54 = -8.18, P

Figures

References Powered by Scopus

4119Citations
1329Readers
2386Citations
2252Readers

This article is free to access.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hargraves, J. D. (2014). Glycemic control in cardiac surgery: Implementing an evidence-based insulin infusion protocol. American Journal of Critical Care, 23(3), 250–258. https://doi.org/10.4037/ajcc2014236

Readers over time

‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘240481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 35

66%

Researcher 13

25%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

8%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

2%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 40

63%

Nursing and Health Professions 19

30%

Social Sciences 2

3%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

3%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0