The enduring challenge of determining pneumonia etiology in children: Considerations for future research priorities

40Citations
Citations of this article
126Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Pneumonia kills more children each year worldwide than any other disease. Nonetheless, accurately determining the causes of childhood pneumonia has remained elusive. Over the past century, the focus of pneumonia etiology research has shifted from studies of lung aspirates and postmortem specimens intent on identifying pneumococcal disease to studies of multiple specimen types distant from the lung that are tested for multiple pathogens. Some major challenges facing modern pneumonia etiology studies include the use of nonspecific and variable case definitions, poor access to pathologic lung tissue and to specimens from fatal cases, poor diagnostic accuracy of assays (especially when testing nonpulmonary specimens), and the interpretation of results when multiple pathogens are detected in a given individual. The future of childhood pneumonia etiology research will likely require integrating data from complementary approaches, including applications of advanced molecular diagnostics and vaccine probe studies, as well as a renewed emphasis on lung aspirates from radiologically confirmed pneumonia and postmortem examinations.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

This article is free to access.

149Citations
624Readers
Get full text

This article is free to access.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Feikin, D. R., Hammitt, L. L., Murdoch, D. R., O’Brien, K. L., & Scott, J. A. G. (2017). The enduring challenge of determining pneumonia etiology in children: Considerations for future research priorities. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 64, S188-196. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cix143

Readers over time

‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2508162432

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 45

61%

Researcher 16

22%

Professor / Associate Prof. 8

11%

Lecturer / Post doc 5

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 35

58%

Immunology and Microbiology 10

17%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8

13%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 7

12%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0