Data anomalies and apparent reporting errors in 'Randomized controlled trial testing weight loss and abdominal obesity outcomes of moxibustion'

2Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) are the best method to determine causal effects for treatments if they are well done and well reported. Good evidence about proposed treatments for obesity is needed, and Hsieh et al. (Biomed Eng Online 17:149, 2018) are to be commended for putting moxibustion to the test. However, careful evaluation of the paper reveals inconsistencies and apparent reporting errors, which raise doubts about conclusions from the study.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mestre, L. M., Dickinson, S. L., Golzarri-Arroyo, L., Brown, A. W., & Allison, D. B. (2020). Data anomalies and apparent reporting errors in “Randomized controlled trial testing weight loss and abdominal obesity outcomes of moxibustion.” BioMedical Engineering Online, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12938-020-0753-z

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free