Evaluation of cisatracurium a new blocking agent, tracheal intubation

63Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: The primary objective of this study was a blinded, randomized comparison of the recommended intubating dose of atracurium (0.5 mg · kg-1) with an approximately equipotent dose of cisatracurium (0.1 mg · kg-1) during N2O/O2/propofol/fentanyl anaesthesia. Methods: Eighty ASA physical status 1 or 2 patients 18-70 yr of age, within 30% of ideal body weight, scheduled for elective low to moderate risk surgical procedures were studied. Adductor pollicis evoked twitch responses were measured with a Grass FT 10 force displacement transducer (Grass Instruments, Quincy, MA) and continuously recorded on a Gould multichannel polygraph (Gould Instrument Systems, Cleveland, OH) after induction of anaesthesia. Results: Increasing the initial dose of cisatracurium from 0.1 to 0.15 and 0.2 mg · k-1, decreased mean time of onset (from 4.6 to 3.4 and 2.8 min, respectively), and increased mean time of clinically effective duration (45 to 55 and 61 min, respectively). Recovery to a T4:T1 ratio of 0.7 occurred approximately seven minutes following administration of the reversal agent neostigmine for all treatment groups. Intubation conditions were good or excellent in over 90% of patients in all treatment groups (two minutes after approximately 2 x ED95 doses of cisatracurium or atracurium and 1.5 minutes after 3x and 4x ED95 doses of cisatraturium). Conclusion: The intubation results reported in this study together with the combination of predictable recovery from neuromuscular block and apparent haemodynamic stability make cisatracurium a potentially useful muscle relaxant in clinical practice.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bluestein, L. S., Stinson, L. W., Lennon Do, R. L., Quessy, S. N., & Wilson, R. M. (1996). Evaluation of cisatracurium a new blocking agent, tracheal intubation. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia, 43(9), 925–931. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03011806

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free