Comparison of the ACC/AHA and Framingham algorithms to assess cardiovascular risk in HIV-infected patients

10Citations
Citations of this article
61Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the predictions of Framingham cardiovascular (CV) risk score (FRS) and the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) risk score in an HIV outpatient clinic in the city of Vitoria, Espirito Santo, Brazil. In a cross-sectional study 341 HIV infected patients over 40 years old consecutively recruited were interviewed. Cohen's kappa coefficient was used to assess agreement between the two algorithms. 61.3% were stratified as low risk by Framingham score, compared with 54% by ACC/AHA score (Spearman correlation 0.845; p < 0.000). Only 26.1% were classified as cardiovascular high risk by Framingham compared to 46% by ACC/AHA score (Kappa = 0.745; p < 0.039). Only one out of eight patients had cardiovascular high risk by Framingham at the time of a myocardial infarction event registered up to five years before the study period. Both cardiovascular risk scores but especially Framingham underestimated high-risk patients in this HIV-infected population.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pinto Neto, L. F. da S., Dias, F. R., Bressan, F. F., & Santos, C. R. O. (2017). Comparison of the ACC/AHA and Framingham algorithms to assess cardiovascular risk in HIV-infected patients. Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases, 21(6), 577–580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjid.2017.06.007

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free