Geometric and featural representations in semantic concepts

2Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We explore the adequacy of two types of similarity representation in the context of semantic concepts. To this end, we evaluate different categorization models, assuming either a geometric or a featural representation, using categorization decisions involving familiar and unfamiliar foods and animals. The study aims to assess the optimal stimulus representation as a function of the familiarity of the stimuli. For the unfamiliar stimuli, the geometric categorization models provide the best account of the categorization data, whereas for the familiar stimuli, the featural categorization models provide the best account. This pattern of results suggests that people rely on perceptual information to assign an unfamiliar stimulus to a category but rely on more elaborate conceptual knowledge when assigning a familiar stimulus. © 2010 The Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Vanpaemel, W., Verbeemen, T., Drv, M., Verguts, T., & Storms, G. (2010). Geometric and featural representations in semantic concepts. Memory and Cognition, 38(7), 962–968. https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.38.7.962

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free