An empirical evaluation of the effectiveness of different types of predictor attributes in protein function prediction

0Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Many classification schemes for defining protein functions, such as Gene Ontology (GO), are organised in a hierarchical structure. Nodes near the root of the hierarchy represent general functions while nodes near the leaves of the hierarchy represent more specific functions, giving the flexibility to specify at which level the protein will be annotated. In a data mining perspective, hierarchical structures present a more challenging problem, since the relationship between nodes need to be considered. This chapter presents an empirical evaluation of different protein representations for protein function prediction in terms of maximizing predictive accuracy, investigating which type of representation is more suitable for different levels of the GO hierarchy. © 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Otero, F., Segond, M., Freitas, A. A., Johnson, C. G., Robilliard, D., & Fonlupt, C. (2009). An empirical evaluation of the effectiveness of different types of predictor attributes in protein function prediction. Studies in Computational Intelligence, 205, 339–357. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01536-6_13

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free