Problems in Testing Informal Logic Critical Thinking Reasoning Ability

  • Ennis R
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
60Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Assuming that 'informal logic', 'critical thinking', and 'reasoning' mean roughly the same in current discussions and texts, ennis notes and suggests ways of dealing with some problems in testing for some aspects of the topic. problems discussed are the inclusion of items that test for a student's value judgments, the importance of background knowledge and beliefs in answering induction items, and treating assumptions as "necessarily made." items from current leading tests are examined and criticized. ennis also explains and criticizes current psychometric doctrine regarding reliability and validity, as applied to critical thinking tests.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ennis, R. H. (1984). Problems in Testing Informal Logic Critical Thinking Reasoning Ability. Informal Logic, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v6i1.2717

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free