Postural responses during falling with rapid reach-and-grasp balance reaction in patients with motor complete paraplegia

12Citations
Citations of this article
92Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Study design: Cross-sectional study. Objectives: To investigate the kinematic, kinetic and electromyographic (EMG) aspects of postural control during falling with rapid reach-and-grasp balance reaction in thoracic cord-injured individuals wearing knee-ankle-foot orthoses (KAFOs). Setting: Institutional Motion Analysis Laboratory. Methods: Seven T7-T12 cord-injured subjects with complete motor loss (ASIA classes A and B) participated in this study. Subjects with KAFOs first stood steady with a modified walker and then released their hold on the walker to maintain self-supported standing until falling with grasping. The center of pressure (COP), center of mass (COM) and joint angles were measured together with EMG of the triceps (TRI), T4 paraspinal and abdominal muscles. Results: After release of the walker, there was a rapid increase of COM-COP distance (that is, from 13.32±11.79 to 54.29±24.56 mm), with COM in front of COP during a forward fall, which was associated with the increases of T4 muscle activities. After the reach-and-grasp reaction, COM moved behind COP, which was associated with the increase of ankle dorsiflexion and the TRI and abdominal muscle activities. Conclusion: The increase of upper back extensor muscle activity might not be enough to correct postural instability during unsupported stance in thoracic spinal cord injury with complete motor loss. The rapid reach-and-grasp reaction is an alternative compensatory mechanism to prevent falling to the ground. © 2008 International Spinal Cord Society All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lin, K. H., Lu, T. W., Hsu, P. P., Yu, S. M., & Liao, W. S. (2008). Postural responses during falling with rapid reach-and-grasp balance reaction in patients with motor complete paraplegia. Spinal Cord, 46(3), 204–209. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.sc.3102100

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free