Temperature Dependence of Structural Relaxation in Glass-Forming Liquids and Polymers

18Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Understanding the microscopic mechanism of the transition of glass remains one of the most challenging topics in Condensed Matter Physics. What controls the sharp slowing down of molecular motion upon approaching the glass transition temperature Tg, whether there is an underlying thermodynamic transition at some finite temperature below Tg, what the role of cooperativity and heterogeneity are, and many other questions continue to be topics of active discussions. This review focuses on the mechanisms that control the steepness of the temperature dependence of structural relaxation (fragility) in glass-forming liquids. We present a brief overview of the basic theoretical models and their experimental tests, analyzing their predictions for fragility and emphasizing the successes and failures of the models. Special attention is focused on the connection of fast dynamics on picosecond time scales to the behavior of structural relaxation on much longer time scales. A separate section discusses the specific case of polymeric glass-forming liquids, which usually have extremely high fragility. We emphasize the apparent difference between the glass transitions in polymers and small molecules. We also discuss the possible role of quantum effects in the glass transition of light molecules and highlight the recent discovery of the unusually low fragility of water. At the end, we formulate the major challenges and questions remaining in this field.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Novikov, V. N., & Sokolov, A. P. (2022, August 1). Temperature Dependence of Structural Relaxation in Glass-Forming Liquids and Polymers. Entropy. MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/e24081101

Readers over time

‘22‘23‘24‘25036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 9

64%

Researcher 3

21%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

14%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Materials Science 5

38%

Chemical Engineering 3

23%

Chemistry 3

23%

Engineering 2

15%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0