‘Things we are expected to just do and deal with’: Using the medical humanities to encourage reflection on vulnerability and nurture clinical skills, collegiality, compassion, and self-care

6Citations
Citations of this article
34Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The Vulnerability in Medicine (ViM) program was developed to provide protected time and psychologically safe spaces for third-year medical students to consider challenges in the doctor-patient relationship and the clinical workplace. A suite of discussion-prompts presented in a small-group learning environment provides a springboard for students to reflect on their development as clinicians, understand the personhood of their patients, explore the therapeutic relationship, and consider emotional responses and personal, cultural, and social assumptions that impact on care. The program supports students to recognise vulnerability in themselves, the patient, their tutors, and the wider clinical team, as they face the challenge of aligning the clinician they want to become with ideals of professionalism and the imperfect clinical workplace. This 6‑week program focuses on the vulnerability of patients, students, and doctors in a weekly tutorial interposed with clinical placements primarily in geriatric, rehabilitation, or palliative medicine. The tutorials draw from the medical humanities and use experiential, reflective, and narrative learning techniques. They are facilitated by generalist clinicians who model their own vulnerability, humanity, and reflective practice by sharing tutorial tasks equally with students. Students report feeling supported, and appreciate the opportunity to discuss ethical, psychosocial, and emotional aspects of medicine whilst reflecting on what medical practice means to them. Tutors experience a deeper appreciation of student journeys and their own vocations as clinicians and teachers. The sharing of vulnerability exposes the humanity of patients, students, and clinicians, and sustains our whole-person approach to the care of patients, students, and ourselves.

References Powered by Scopus

The use of reflection in medical education: AMEE Guide No. 44

697Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Medical students' professionalism narratives: A window on the informal and hidden curriculum

225Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Transformative learning as pedagogy for the health professions: a scoping review

128Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The Lancet Commission on medicine, Nazism, and the Holocaust: historical evidence, implications for today, teaching for tomorrow

36Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Enhancing self-care education amongst medical students: a systematic scoping review

11Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cinemeducation: A mixed methods study on learning through reflective thinking, perspective taking and emotional narratives

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kelly, M., Lynch, J., Mainstone, P., Green, A., & Sturman, N. (2022). ‘Things we are expected to just do and deal with’: Using the medical humanities to encourage reflection on vulnerability and nurture clinical skills, collegiality, compassion, and self-care. Perspectives on Medical Education, 11(5), 300–304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-022-00724-w

Readers over time

‘22‘23‘24‘2505101520

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Lecturer / Post doc 5

50%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

40%

Researcher 1

10%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 5

42%

Social Sciences 3

25%

Materials Science 2

17%

Nursing and Health Professions 2

17%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0